Something is rotten in the state of Germany

Over the past week or two, there has been an absolute explosion of Islamic terrorism in Germany. The sheer lack of time between these events is crazy, as it shows that Muslims are getting more bold in their aggression. I want to go over these few attacks and their impact on Europe, and why I think this explosion of terrorism has occurred.

The first attack in Germany, after Nice, France, was in Würzberg, Germany where an Afghan refugee attacked Germans on a train. Fortunately, there were no deaths, and the police were able to kill this psycho before he murdered anyone. The significant thing about this one was this person was actually a refugee let in by the irresponsible German government who was living with foster parents. Two foster parents who I assume were red-pilled quickly after. The two warnings this attack gives is proof that some refugees are dangerous, and also proof that young Muslim teenagers are not assimilating.

After Wurzberg, another attack occurred when a Muslim stabbed a mother and her daughter for being “inappropriately dressed”. It is notable that now whites cannot even dress how they want without fear of being attacked by Muslims. Quickly after this there was another attack this time by a Syrian refugee with a machete. He killed a pregnant mother. These two horrible attacks on women will hopefully wake up so called “feminists” of the danger of importing people who treat women awfully. But we all know these Leftists will not see the danger. They will just keep letting it in.

Then there was Munich, where an Iranian shot and killed 9 people in a mall. Another proof that strict gun control is ineffective against criminals. This one seemed a bit more complicated in motive than the standard Islamic attack, but I think there was at least some Islamic influence. According to some witnesses, the Iranian shouted “Allahu Akbar”, but others say he was inspired by school shooters. But, regardless of the influence of Islam, this person should not have been in Germany in the first place. It is so absurd that he is called a German by the media, when anyone with eyes could tell he is not German.

And lastly, was the big one that was thwarted. A successful example of how racial profiling saves lives. A suicide bomber tried to get into a music festival but was denied, he then went to a restaurant to blow himself up, killing no one but injuring ten. This situation was extremely disturbing, but thankfully avoided.

I think what we are seeing is the real time effects of Germany’s insane immigration policy. Germany let in the most migrants, and after a few months of getting adjusted, the terrorism has begun. This is only the start, and I imagine when a Nice-style attack happens in Germany, all hell will break lose. The scariest part is I don’t know if Germans will even fight for their country. They are so cucked by the shadow of Hitler that they are scared to death of standing up to their own death.

The Religion of Egalitarianism-Part 1

Yesterday, Iowa politician Steve King sparked controversy at the RNC by stating the historical fact that white people created most of Western Civilization. Somehow, somewhere along the way, it became racist to tell the truth about history. Leftists were quick to call King a “white supremacist”, ignoring the fact that he was simply defending himself against an anti-white racist complaining about “old white men”. As Steve Sailor said in his blog, this was an “emperor has no clothes” moment. Everyone on that panel knows what King said was true, yet they acted outraged nonetheless. It still blows my mind that what King said, which was respectful in tone and not derogatory to anyone, is called racist. It just proves the word has no meaning anymore. Using this story as a starting point, I want to explore how radical egalitarianism, or what I call Leftism, has become a religion.

It should be quite alarming to any rational person that historical facts that are positive to white people are called racist. It is undoubtedly true that whites invented practically all modern technology, philosophy, literature, art, and civilization. There is a reason why people all over the world want to migrate to the West. There is a reason why the standard of living is so much higher in the West. It is why the global elite see Western doctors when their sick, and why rich foreigners send their children to American and European universities for education. The Leftists who deny that whites have made the greatest contribution to history always threaten to leave for Canada or Europe if a Republican is elected president, not Africa or the Middle East. Saying that Western Civilization is the best is not racist, it is a fact. It is extremely disturbing that this is somehow controversial today, but when you view egalitarianism as a religion, rather than a belief or a value, it makes sense. Imagine confronting a devout Christian, who believes that the Earth is 5000 years old and denies evolution. It would be practically impossible to convince them otherwise (especially if they were middle-aged or older), and they might accuse you of being a heathen or tell you that you are going to hell. While Christians today tend to be polite and don’t name call, in the past there were Christians who shut down men the truthful voices of men like Galileo and Copernicus. Does this situation ring a bell? Both Christians (and devout people of any faith) and radical Leftists believe in alternate histories. The religious believe in a historical fantasy where men walked the earth with dinosaurs, while the egalitarian believes in a historical fantasy where Africans were developing super-computers in the 2nd century. I am exaggerating the outlandishness of both parties claims, but the claims they make are similar in the detail that they are simply not true!

I think some of the founders and early believers of egalitarianism don’t believe their own revisionist history. They know the truth about human history but they wish to not bring it up to avoid causing discomfort. I understand their logic, even though I don’t agree with it. And I think it is fine for them to think that way. But then they attack white people and expect us not to fire back. Steve King did not just say this for no reason, the other panelist said something completely racist against whites so King defended whites. It would be one thing if King was just trying to be a dick, but he wasn’t, he was defending his, and millions of Americans, race. We used to have a saying that said if you can’t take it don’t dish it out. If your going to actively trash white men for a living, don’t be surprised when the white men defend themselves. But that was a tangent. Back to the point, and a scary point it is, is that I think many in the Millennial generation (the ones who are Leftists) actually believe this revisionist history. Now I haven’t been to many college history lectures (no one has, really, even a history PhD has only taken courses at a few universities at most), but I suspect they teach more like Howard Zinn than Herodotus. I suspect they diminish the accomplishments of whites and boost the accomplishments of non-whites, all subtly in their sophistry to create a generation that believes that what Steve King said was false. And if the Leftists in academia can rewrite history for these kids, they can control them, and that is what is so dangerous about this. If you ask the average, normal person about the American Revolution they will probably tell you about George Washington and the Constitution. But if you ask the average SJW they will tell you about the role of women and slaves in the Revolution. This view of history is Marxist in origin and extremely appealing to entitled people. It says that your insignificant ancestors were just as important as George Washington. But that is bullshit. I am not related to any great historical figures. Most of my ancestors were probably unimportant, poor peasants. And that is okay. Because I am not a narcissist. But a narcissist would be utterly offended if someone made the claim that their great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandfather was insignificant. And with narcissism being on the rise in our population, one can see why many are adopting this view of history. A narcissist feels good by hearing the slave, or the housewife, or the common man, was just as important as Napoleon or King Henry, but that is simply not true, and believing some crap like that not a good thing.

I am not personally very religious. I identify as a Christian culturally, but religion plays a very minimal role in my life. Nietzsche wrote about God being dead and what would happen after the end of Christianity in the West. I do believe that most people cannot function without a sort of religion and that radical egalitarianism is something that has, in a sad sense, replaced Christianity in the West. I don’t think it will last, because it is so at odds with all human nature and history, but it has acquired many believers. I want to keep exploring this theme of radical egalitarianism as a religion in the future, as more similar events rise in the news cycle! Thanks for reading!

 

White Lives Matter

July 17, 2016-This article was written July 7, immediately after I heard the news of the Dallas Police Shootings. Sadly, the future violence I predicted came to roost this Sunday as a black radical extremist shot three police officers in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. 

Tonight, the words became blood. The hateful rhetoric spoused by Black Lives Matter came to its logical conclusion, and four Dallas police officers are now dead. Seven more are injured, gunned down in the streets amid a protest. Racial tensions in America are already at an all time high, and this tragedy in Dallas will only boost them to even greater heights. The reactions of the public can already be predicted. The faux moralists on the Left will try to shift the focus onto guns, as if an inanimate gun can just spontaneously come to life and shoot a police officer. The cuckservatives will preach about “unity” and “coming together in the wake of tragedy”, yet they will not engage in any meaningful discussion on race, because it makes them feel bad. But worst of all will be the despicable reactions of some black people and Leftists, who will feel that the actions of this terrorist were justified. It will only be a matter of time before Leftist online news outlets and MSNBC start to spin this story into an anti-white narrative. Black twitter already has. The catalyst for these protests was the recent shooting of a career criminal named Alton Sterling in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. A sex offender who had been arrested dozens of times was shot by police after resisting arrest and attempting to pull a gun on the officers. In retaliation for the death of this thug, blacks and Leftists all over the nation came out into the streets of our once great American cities to “peacefully” protest “police brutality”. But the protests in Dallas were not peaceful. Tonight, we have witnessed the culmination of black anger against white America. How did we get to this point? Why is nothing changing? What can be done to improve race relations? These are the questions that normal, unawakened people are asking tonight. But some White Americans are beginning to realize that they are tired of asking these unanswerable questions. And they are beginning to ask new questions, more specific questions. And these questions are not about guns, or police brutality, or coming together. They are about race.

All sane white Americans know deep down that there is something very wrong with black culture. On the surface, it is the vulgar rap lyrics, the sagged pants, the slurred language, the tattoos, and the general glorification of gang culture. Under the surface, it is the massive amounts of poverty, illiteracy, drug abuse, and cultural problems that plague the black community. And on the societal plane, it is the outstanding crime rates. Black males have crime rates that greatly exceed any other demographic in such an extreme way that it is impossible to deny that something is very wrong with their culture. Many whites, mainly in the south and in rural areas, will bluntly admit this, but even the wealthy white liberals, who are completely brainwashed by the Leftist egalitarian religion, subconsciously admit it. Yes, they would never openly remark on black criminality or antisocial behavior. Yes, they claim to be for equal rights, and yes, they do consider racism to be the worst sin a person could commit. Yet, the actions of these white liberals betrays them. Their actions admit that they have an understanding of the black problem. They admit it with their 99% white neighborhoods. Many of them even live in states with an overwhelmingly white population. They admit it when they send their children to private, nearly all white schools. They admit it when they stay away from the darker parts of town. The women admit it when they clench their purses a little bit tighter when a group of black youths walk by. While they speak loudly of civil rights and racial equality, their actions betray them. As the old saying goes, actions speak louder than words, and their actions expose them. Most of them probably do not even realize this though, and as long as they are ignorant of their own consciousness, they will never be the ones who find a solution to our nation’s racial problems. So what is the root cause of black criminality? This is a question that has been debated by men much smarter than me for decades, so I will not attempt to answer it here. But it is evident that nearly 60 years after the Civil Rights Movement, the conditions of black Americans are not getting better, but are getting worse. The Civil Rights Movement was a change that felt good, it felt right, and it felt moral. But the truth is that most blacks lived happier, safer lives under segregation. The peak of truly great black art and culture was the Harlem Renaissance, a movement that occurred during the 1920s, nearly 40 years before Martin Luther King and Malcolm X. Under segregation, there was much less crime for both races, black and white. There were more black fathers staying faithful to their wives and being active in the lives of their children. There was a vast respect for Christianity, the religion they adopted from whites, and a general fostering of social attitudes. But today’s post integration black culture is a direct opposite to those things. It is almost as if blacks, now being in an integrated society, had to find a way to create a culture different than whites, to stand out. Yet, by any objective standard, they have failed. In an attempt to compete with white culture, they have created a culture that is opposite of all the things that made white culture great. The majority of white men are faithful to their wives and children, the majority of black men are not. White men generally don’t break the law, especially in the cases of homicide and assault, black men generally do break the law, and specialize in homicide and assault. White men generally are educated and employed, black men are generally neither educated nor employed. This is not racist, these are just the facts. It is no longer derogatory to say blacks should just mimic white culture. Perhaps if they did this, after reaching success this way, they could branch out and create a new, successful subculture. But this black culture is a failed culture. Would not everyone be happier if black people basically acted like whites? Blacks would live longer, healthier, and more content lives. They would get better jobs and better educations. They would have better family lives. Ben Carson is commonly accused of being an “Uncle Tom” and “acting white”, but in reality Carson is much better off personally than the average negro who “acts black”, and is also much more productive to society. Neither is it racist to prefer blacks that “act white”. “Acting white” is more or less a synonym for behaving in a civilized manner. “Acting black” is being a savage.

But the facts in the above paragraph are not what is awakening white America today. What is awakening white America is the resentment of blacks towards whites that is evidenced by what happened tonight in Dallas. In the back of the mind of every normal white person, even the ones that go out of their way to help the black community, is this: Why do they hate us? It is apparent that this resentment is at an all time high among blacks. And I hypothesize that the root reason may be just plain jealousy. It is not unbelievable that the average African-American with an IQ of 85 will feel oppressed in a society that functions on a much higher IQ plane. The correlation between IQ and success in society can be proven through the general wealth of even smaller minorities than blacks, like Asians and Jews. Neither are white, yet both these races, who have very high average IQs, are successful in white society. It is a sad fact that in the modern United States, having a low IQ is a for sure way to ensure a life of poverty and unhappiness. I am sure that the resentment starts on a different level for every angry black, and it is not hard to understand why this jealousy festers. Imagine the black child, forced into a white school system, one he cannot intellectually succeed in, forced to drop out of high school. That is not a very fun situation, and I empathize with that child. But this is no excuse to hate whites. I am sure it is depressing for a black to see that even with the help of Affirmative Action, their race cannot compete with whites on any objective intellectual level. And that is just one imaginary example of how black resentment starts. And as the world gets more technologically progressed, this divide will grow even starker. And while this is tragic in a way, it is just life. Evolution made the races into what they are, and nothing can change that. If the black community truly wants to change, they must stop the anti-white and anti-police rhetoric, and focus inward. While they cannot change who the fundamentally are, they can change their attitudes if they work hard enough. With proper guidance, black fathers would stay with their children, black youths would stop joining gangs and selling drugs, and black culture would stop glorifying the “thug life”. But this will probably never happen. The victimization and blame seems to becoming more deeply ingrained in the black psyche. At least I cannot see it coming any time soon. And whites are beginning to wake up.

America is getting tired. We are tired of playing along in this silly game of equality and egalitarianism. There is nothing equal about the white violent crime rate compared to the black violent crime rate. We are tired of the virtue signaling. We are tired of trying to see the other side of the story. We tired of pretending not to see what is going on when it is so obvious that even a blind man could see it. We are tired of black crime. We are tired of black outrage. The fact is we don’t need them, they need us. We put way more into the system then we get out. They take out way more into the system than they put in. We are tired of ruined schools. We are tired of ruined cities. We are tired of Obama. We are tired of them taking a massive shit on what was once a great country. And we are tired of being called racists every time we shine light to the problem and attempt to help them fix it. These iconic racial events are changing the mind of the average white. The images are becoming ingrained in their minds. Ferguson up in flames. Blacks lives matter shutting down the highway. Five officers dead in Dallas. Racial egalitarianism is dying, and the Left is losing.

Why I Am A Traditionalist

In the modern United States, there are many labels used by the population to signal their political affiliation, and these terms carry with them various connotations. Many people who could be ideologically grouped in one group may refuse to identify as the said group because they do not want to be associated with those connotations. What makes this fascinating is the constant changing of the meanings of these words. A liberal in 1776 is not even remotely similar to a modern liberal, or even a modern conservative. A conservative in 1968 is not very similar to a conservative today. A 1992 Democrat is worlds away from a 2016 Democrat; and a 1900 Republican is different than a 1980 Republican. The point being is that these terms: Democrat and Republican, Liberal and Conservative, Progressive and Libertarian, and so on, are constantly changing. When I am personally asked my political affiliation, I answer “Traditionalist”, which is, in my opinion, a powerful, cunning, and truthful label, and I will briefly discuss the problems of other affiliations, and why Traditionalist is such an appropriate label for myself and others who share my views.

I am totally opposed to all forms of modern Liberalism, which are twisted distortions of the Liberalism practiced by our Founding Fathers. I call 20th and 21st Century liberalism, “Leftism”, since it is so radically different than any of the Liberalism that originated in the Enlightenment. Leftism is a movement primarily inspired by Karl Marx with strains of the worst parts of American culture mixed in. Leftism is not as much of a political affiliation as it is a religion, whose members are the descendants of the witch-hunting Puritans bred with the most radical Communists. The methods of the modern Left are almost completely identical to those utilized by the Puritans in Massachusetts Bay Colony. Just as the 1692 zealots made vague claims of witchcraft and satanism in order to both satisfy their animalistic, violent urges, and also, of course, to rid themselves of troublesome individuals, the Leftists of today make even less substantiated claims of racism, sexism, etcetera, to ostracize and destroy the lives of those who do not agree with their politically correct dogma. It is hilarious that Leftists claim to be on the “right side of history” (which is a completely irritating phrase to begin with), when 99% of the people who have ever walked on the face of the earth would be totally opposed to the tenets of the Modern Left. Contrary to the Leftist doctrine, most people throughout history have preferred Nationalism to Globalism, maintained traditional values, and were very in tune with the natural, evolutionary differences which make human beings who they are. To a Leftist, 99% of human beings who ever lived, would be racists. But the topic of this essay is not Leftism (I will save that for another time); it is Traditionalism. Yet, we must tackle another dragon, and that is Conservatism.

In the most literal sense, I would properly identify myself as a Conservative, but unfortunately this label has been twisted into something entirely different than traditional conservative thought. The face of modern American Conservatism is the Republican Party. I am not necessarily a Republican (although they are the best hope the Right has, and are useful for some things), and I do not particularly care for the modern or historical GOP (even though they are still worlds better than the modern or historical Democratic Party). In my opinion, American Conservatism peaked under the presidencies of Harding and Coolidge in the 1920s. After WWII, when the world’s lust for globalism reached its height, the American Right started its descent into intermixing and dabbling in Leftism. There were a few exceptional periods such as the McCarthy Era, the Goldwater and Buchanan presidential runs, and now Trump, but, in general, post-war Conservatism has been a pissing contest between self-proclaimed Conservatives to see who can be seen as more progressive by the Leftists. A stunning example where this appeasement came to a head was George W. Bush’s remarks that “Islam is a religion of peace” after 9-11. Unable to criticize a culture that fosters unfathomable hate towards the U. S., our elected leader pandered to this destructive ideology that has no place in America in any real way. But in Bush’s defense, Obama’s zeal for Islam is something that cannot be explained away by mere virtue signaling and is much more troubling, especially coming from Obama, an explicitly Anti-American president. Nor do I have any respect for Republicans who support open borders and amnesty programs, such as Paul Ryan. These Republicans are traitors to their base, and care more about abstract ideals such as “free trade” than the actual well-being of their constituents. The modern Republican party even degrades the character of their primary base, which is whites, and prefers to pander to groups of minorities who have no intention of ever voting for the GOP anyway. What has the GOP done to fight the prevailing liberal stereotype that Republicans are uneducated racists? I am, however, a strong advocate of Donald Trump’s candidacy, and realize the necessity of the GOP as a vehicle to drive Trump to the White House. I believe I could basically agree with the tenets of a Trump Republican Party, even though I have no affinity for the Republican Party as defined by Paul Ryan and Mitt Romney. Until Republicans accept their fate and begin to emphasize with the concerns of their members, and also put to end to the Leftist dogma of virtue signaling and trying to court racial minorities, I cannot call myself a Republican. If Trump changes this, then I will be much more comfortable with labeling as a Republican.

Many people who are not Democrats or Republicans tend to be Libertarian types, combining the fiscal conservatism of the Republicans with the liberal social ideals of the Democrats. While I agree with quasi-Libertarians like Ted Cruz about the importance of the military and social conservatism, I am not such a big fan of the over-idealistic ideology of Libertarianism. The fetish for the infallibility of the Constitution is a staple of Libertarian thought, and the document is spoused like it is the literal Word of God given to Moses on Mount Sinai. While I agree with anyone who says the Founding Fathers were geniuses who founded one of the most exceptional Republics known to man, which I wish can be saved, I also recognize that the Founders never anticipated the demographic changes and the societal changes that mark modern day America. Maintaining the core of the Constitution, such as the 1st and 2nd amendments, is essential to the survival of our country, but we must not be shackled by the Constitution, especially since our Leftist opponents flagrantly abuse and disregard the document. Many of the Left’s “Constitutional” legislation and policies would cause the Founders to roll over in their graves. The Founders never intended for universal voting rights. They never intended for mass non-white immigration. The never intended for gay marriage. Yet all these things are considered “constitutional” by the legal minds of the Left. The Left has been aggressive in pursuing their desires, while the Right stands frozen, scared of violating laws of constitutionality. There is no responsibility to fight honorably against a dishonorable opponent. The Constitution is an excellent form of government, but it was intended for what was to be a White Republic, not a Multi-Cultural direct democracy. While Libertarians thinkers admit that the size of government has massively expanded to a preposterous and dangerous size, they refuse to admit that it is they who are guilty of allowing this, in so many ways. A striking example of one of Conservatism’s most crucial blunders was the Liberal takeover of popular culture. The Leftist’ have successfully appealed to the masses; they control Hollywood, the Media, Sports, and the moral zeitgeist. And the Right just let them take it, they offered no opposition. When Republicans were challenged with a charismatic enemy in 2008 and 2012 (Obama), they did not put up an equivalent Republican option, they could not find a candidate to invigorate the party. Now McCain and Romney, despite all their flaws, would have clearly been better choices than Obama, yet how does the Republican Party expect the uneducated masses to get excited for these men? Unfortunately, when it comes down to it, most “Americans” prefer a pretty face talking about “Hope and Change” than an old man preaching about the Constitution and the Federalist Papers. Just look at the base of the Libertarian Party and it is painfully obvious why these misfits will never take power. They are nerdy, ugly, and painfully unlikeable. The common people would rather be associated with the political party of George Clooney (Democratic, if you don’t know), than some pimply faced loser watching anime and playing computer games in his mother’s basement. The culture war needs to be won soundly by the New Right, and I think that with the rise of meme culture this is already happening. Both the older and younger generations are infatuated with social networks such as Facebook and Twitter, which encourage extreme political polarization. We need to make sure that this favors the Right, and so far, we are winning, despite the attempted censorship of people like Mark Zuckerberg and his progressive allies in Silicon Valley. But the internet pales in comparison to our candidate for president, Donald J. Trump, who is an American cultural icon. The star of The Apprentice, who is full of charisma and likability, has beautiful children and wealth beyond the common man’s fantasies, Trump is finally the dream candidate for people on the Right, a figure to excite and exhilarate the base in the same way Obama excited liberals. To put it simply, the Right loves him more than they loved Mitt Romney, and the Left hates him more than they hated Mitt Romney. Trump is just what the Right needed, a strong leader who has no concern with appeasing Leftists, the first Republican to do so since Ronald Reagan. In contrast, Hillary Clinton is dreadfully unlikeable, and is reminiscent of a cat lady at best, and a comic book villain, at worst. Unlike Bernie Sanders, who rallied the young Leftists, these same Leftists will either dutifully vote for her, or forget to vote at all.

So why should “Traditionalist” be used as an identifier for now? The Leftist world has waged war on that word, “Tradition”. At every turn of the fight, Leftists have attempted to destroy any American or European tradition. The Left is waging a war on the Anglo-American culture that has consistently given the best humanity has to offer. A striking but small example of how the Left is attempting to undermine traditional American culture is the announced replacement of Andrew Jackson on the twenty dollar bill. He will be replaced by the black woman, Harriet Tubman. This change is the natural conclusion of the Leftist character attack that has been waged on President Jackson for many years. The Left has revised history so now the average high-school or college student is given the impression that Jackson was some kind of genocidal, racist maniac, and a figure we should be ashamed of. But contrary to the Leftist revisionist history, real history is much more complex and nuanced than their black and white worldview. The Leftist’s rail on about the Trail of Tears (even that name is an appeal to pathos), but never mention the adoption of an Indian son by Jackson, they never discuss the cultural attitudes toward the Indian question during the time period. They never mention the atrocities committed by Native Americans on the white settlers. All they care about is destroying the reputation of a traditional American icon, Andrew Jackson. But they won’t stop at defaming Old Hickory. They have already starting criticizing and slandering George Washington and Thomas Jefferson because of their ownership of slaves. And today it is a radical Marxist professor blaspheming Washington and Jefferson in a college classroom, but tomorrow it will be the erasure of our heroes from history all together. This is why I am not a conservative, but a traditionalist. For what exactly is the modern conservative attempting to conserve? It is unspecified and depending on who is asked, this may change. The proponents of mass immigration, based on its benefits to the global economy, certainly are not concerned with conserving our traditional heritage. And that is just one of many examples. But, as a traditionalist, it is clear and up front what I am wishing to conserve. Western Culture. Christianity. The American Tradition.